Legal Opinion
United States v. Allegan Metal Finishing Co.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided June 6, 1988No. K86-441-CA4PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENSLEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff United States of America (“plaintiff”) brings this action pursuant to provisions of the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), 42 U.S. C. § 6901, et seq. and invokes jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 6928(a) and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1345 and 1355. Presently before me is defendant Allegan Metal Finishing Company’s (“defendant” or “Alle-gan”) motion for immediate consideration of certain threshold liability issues which were previously set forth in the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. The cross-motions for summary judgment…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States (EPA) v. Environmental Waste Control, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
- United States v. Bethlehem Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Williams Pipe Line Co. v. Bayer Corp.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1997
- Lutz v. Chromatex, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- United States v. Power Engineering Company Redoubt, Ltd. And Richard J. Lilienthal, Defendants-Third-Party v. Jack Lilienthal, Third-Party-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.