Williams Pipe Line Co. v. Bayer Corp.
District Court, S.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BREMER, Chief United States Magistrate Judge.
This case arises from Defendant Bayer Corporation’s (“Bayer”) refusal to allow Plaintiff Williams Pipeline Company (“Williams”) to enter its property to implement Williams’ planned remediation of the environmental contamination on Bayer’s property. The contamination has come from spills and leaks of petroleum hydrocarbons from above-ground storage tanks, and other releases on Williams’ land. Williams seeks a declaratory judgment allowing it access to Bayer’s land to install monitoring and recovery equipment for remediation of Bayer’s property.
B…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. TrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ernest Dague, Sr., Ernest Dague, Jr., Betty Dague, and Rose A. Bessette v. City of BurlingtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Group Against Smog & Pollution, Inc. v. Shenango Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Karr v. HefnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- City of Birmingham Retirement & Relief System v. GoodSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
- Hawai'i Wildlife Fund v. County of MauiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2014
- Little Hocking Water Ass'n v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.