United States v. Power Engineering Company Redoubt, Ltd. And Richard J. Lilienthal, Defendants-Third-Party v. Jack Lilienthal, Third-Party-Defendant
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellee United States, acting on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), sought a mandatory preliminary injunction directing Defendant-Appellants Power Engineering Company (“PEC”), Redoubt, Ltd., and Richard J. Lilienthal (collectively, “Defendants”), to comply with the financial assurance regulations adopted by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (“CDPHE”) under authority delegated to Colorado by the EPA pursuant to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (“RCRA”). The district court granted the mandatory…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Equifax Services, Inc., D/B/A Equifax Commercial Specialists F/k/a White & White Inspection and Audit Service, Inc. v. Steven A. HitzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Tefel v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Elam Construction, Inc. v. Regional Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Kansas Department Of Social And Rehabilitation Services v. Kansas Health Care AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Davis v. MinetaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- People v. Thoro Products Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- People v. Thoro Products Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- Center for Community Action & Environmental Justice v. BNSF Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Fireworks Spectacular, Inc. v. Premier Pyrotechnics, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.