Legal Opinion

Federal Land Bank of Wichita v. Story

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 3, 1988No. 68077PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*589DOOLIN, Chief Justice.

The question presented on appeal is whether the trial court erred by finding unconstitutional the Oklahoma Mortgage Foreclosure Moratorium Act, 62 O.S.Supp. 1986, §§ 492, 493. We find the Act unconstitutional on its face as a violation of the Contracts Clause of the United States and Oklahoma Constitutions, and as a violation of Article II, § 6, of the Oklahoma Constitution.

In 1986, in response to a limited economic emergency in the State of Oklahoma, the legislature passed the Oklahoma Mortgage Foreclosure Moratorium Act, 62 O.S.Supp. 1986, §§ 492, 493, which provides:

FA…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  2. Chandler (U.S.A.), Inc. v. TyreeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  3. McGINNITY v. KIRKSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  4. Morton v. Adair County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. James v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API