Legal Opinion

Foster v. Union Starch & Refining Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 26, 1956No. Term 56-F-1PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scheineman

Melvin C. Foster, the plaintiff, was injured while working for the defendant, Términal Railroad Association of St. Louis, switching cars within the premises of the defendant, Union Starch & Refining Co. The jury returned a verdict against said Starch Co. in the amount of $15,000 and found the Railroad Association not guilty. The trial court then entered judgment on the verdict as to the Eailroad Association, but, on motion of the defendant, Starch Co., entered judgment nptwithstanding the 'verdict in its favor, or, in the alternative, granted a new trial to this defendant.

The plaintiff is now…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Lindroth v. Walgreen Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Devine v. DelanoIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Ballance v. DunningtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Marceau v. Rutland Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. LaBruttoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. Ryan v. MonsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  3. Richman Chemical Co. v. LowenthalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  4. Taylor v. the Carborundum Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  5. Larson v. ThomashowAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API