Legal Opinion

Taylor v. the Carborundum Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 20, 1969No. Gen. 52,330PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dempsey

The plaintiffs, Fred Taylor and Ralph Rosenberger, were injured when a grinding wheel manufactured by the defendant, The Carborundum Company, shattered. They commenced separate actions against the defendant which were consolidated for trial. The jury returned a verdict in their favor and awarded Taylor $50,000 and Rosenberger $1,500 damages.

The defendant’s major contention is that it is entitled to an outright reversal because of the plaintiffs’ failure to prove certain elements necessary for recovery under a strict products liability theory. In the alternative, it points to alleged…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Shramek v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  4. Jakubowski v. Minnesota Mining and ManufacturingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  5. Sweeney v. MatthewsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Chitta R. Nanda, Cross-Appellant v. Ford Motor Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  2. Stanley v. Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. Frisch v. International Harvester Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. Larson v. ThomashowAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. Brissette v. Milner Chevrolet CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API