Legal Opinion

Redd v. Household Finance Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1981No. 43224PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUDLOWSKI, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs, James A. and Mary L. Redd alleged the execution of separate agreements which exacted interest in excess of the maximum allowed by § 408.030 with each of the following defendants:1 Household Finance Corporation, hereinafter HFC, Nationwide Finance Corporation of Missouri, hereinafter Nationwide, Franklin Finance Company, hereinafter Franklin, Preferred Loan Corporation, hereinafter Preferred, and Chippewa Bank, hereinafter Chippewa. Plaintiffs also alleged all defendants conspired together to exact usurious interest from plaintiffs. Upon defendant’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Royster v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. WeinrichMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Koenig v. SkaggsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  4. Beneficial Finance Co. of St. Charles v. KitsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Lucas v. Beco Homes, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Residential Funding Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Gettings v. FarrMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Wilner v. O'DONNELLMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Rice's Feed Service, Inc. v. DodsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. MM Finance, LLC, d/b/a EZ Money Check Cashing v. Andrea I. RoseMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API