People v. Pennachio
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert S. Kreindler, J.
Defendant moves to suppress certain anticipated testimony and any fruits thereof on the basis that the testimony would violate the common interest privilege. This decision explains the court’s oral ruling.
Defendants Joseph Pennachio, Steven Ruiz, Anthony Scarpati and John Tánico were indicted for murder in the second degree in connection with the beating death of Manuel Aucaquizphi in Dyker Park. The four defendants and their counsel attended several meetings where it is alleged that a joint defense strategy was discussed. Defendant Tánico…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- People v. PoblinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- People v. GombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonNew York Supreme Court · 1998
- Wellin v. WellinDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2016
- Parisi v. LeppardNew York Supreme Court · 1997