Legal Opinion

People v. Pennachio

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Robert S. Kreindler, J.

Defendant moves to suppress certain anticipated testimony and any fruits thereof on the basis that the testimony would violate the common interest privilege. This decision explains the court’s oral ruling.

Defendants Joseph Pennachio, Steven Ruiz, Anthony Scarpati and John Tánico were indicted for murder in the second degree in connection with the beating death of Manuel Aucaquizphi in Dyker Park. The four defendants and their counsel attended several meetings where it is alleged that a joint defense strategy was discussed. Defendant Tánico…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. People v. PoblinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. People v. GombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonNew York Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Wellin v. WellinDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2016
  3. Parisi v. LeppardNew York Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API