Legal Opinion
Parisi v. Leppard
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 2, 1997PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert Roberto, Jr., J.
The motion of all defendants, except Neal Smith, M.D., and cross motion of defendant Smith to quash subpoenas duces tecum dated February 14, 1997 are decided as follows:
The subpoenas at issue were served by plaintiff Ralph Parisi, M.D., on Jacob Steiner, Esq., defendant John J. Leppard’s former attorney, and on Richard Weiss, Esq., defendant Smith’s attorney. Although they are not the attorneys of record in the present litigation, both Mr. Steiner and Mr. Weiss were involved in the events that led to the suit. The action is founded on the alleged…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Spectrum Systems International v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Rossi v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. OsorioNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Matter of Vanderbilt (Rosner-Hickey)New York Court of Appeals · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Allied Irish Banks, P.L.C. v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Gulf Islands Leasing, Inc. v. Bombardier Capital, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonNew York Supreme Court · 1998
- Bank of America, NA v. Terra Nova Ins. Co. Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Ambac Assurance Corp. v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.