De Contreras v. City of Rialto
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN PART AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS’ REMAINING CLAIMS
VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, District Judge.
The Court has received and considered all Defendants’ papers filed in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs’ evidentiary objections to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. A hearing on this matter took place on September 10, 2012. Both parties’ counsel submitted on the Court’s tentative order without oral argument.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Vanessa Morales, Raquel Padilla, Emiliano Michael De Contreras, and Mario Diaz filed a…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Montoya v. Orange County Sheriff's DepartmentDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Derek Tate v. Diana Nakashyan, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Grant v. Multnomah County JailDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Gypsum Resources LLC v. Clark CountyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
- Martinez-Arriaga v. Briggs Management LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025