Legal Opinion

Derek Tate v. Diana Nakashyan, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 3, 2025No. 1:22-cv-00624Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEREK TATE, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00624-SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. MOTION TO COMPEL 14 DIANA NAKASHYAN, et al., (Doc. 48) 15 Defendants. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S CONSTRUED MOTIONS FOR 16 RECONSIDERATION 17 (Docs. 62 & 63) 18 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 The undersigned issued a temporary stay of these proceedings on January 14, 2025. (Doc. 21 68.) Specifically, the action was stayed pending the Court’s determination of the following 22 motions: 23 1. Plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
  4. 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API