Suwannee River Finance, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs sue for construction-differential subsidy payments 1 in the amount of $1,339,682 for changes made in the construction of three ships. The Maritime Administration (MarAd) denied such payments pursuant to a directive that stopped all subsidies for non-essential changes.
Facts
The Merchant Marine Act of 1936, 46 U.S.C. §§ 1101-1295g (1982), was enacted to foster the development of the merchant marine and ship construction industry. Pursuant to the Act, MarAd is responsible for maintaining a large, well-equipped and efficient domestic merchant fleet. See…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Emeco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Jackson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Yosemite Park & Curry Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Dana Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Bishop Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- G & H Machinery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Square One Armoring Services Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022