Legal Opinion

Morris v. Kauffman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1935No. Appeals, 222 and 223PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

James, J.,

Plaintiffs, father and mother, and minor child, obtained judgments against the defendant in an action of trespass for personal injuries suffered by the minor child. Defendant has appealed and assigns as error the refusal of his motion for judgment non obstante veredicto.

The first and second questions raised in the appellant’s statement of questions involved, raise the question of defendant’s negligence and the minor plaintiff’s contributory negligence.

In passing upon a motion for judgment n. o. v., we must follow the oft repeated rule that the testimony should not only be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rhoads v. HerbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Michener v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Kuehne v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  4. Dempsey v. Cuneo Eastern, Press Ink Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Idell v. DaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. PachterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Hanrahan v. McClatchyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Haney v. BobishSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Kovacs v. AjharSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Smith v. PachterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API