Legal Opinion

Smith v. Pachter

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 30, 1941No. Appeals, 97-100PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Parker,

These actions in trespass by minors and their parents will be disposed of in one opinion as they involve the same facts and were tried by one jury. The causes arose as the result of a collision at a street intersection be tween an automobile owned and driven by the defendant and a sled on Avhich the minors were coasting. At the conclusion of the trial, binding instructions were given for the defendant, judgments Avere entered on the verdicts, and the plaintiffs have appealed. We are of the opinion that the deductions to be drawn from the evidence are not so clear…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Guilinger v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Leslie v. CatanzaroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Rhoads v. HerbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Post v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Shaffer v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lear v. Shirk's Motor Express Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Holton v. GibsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Jones v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Huber v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Smith v. PachterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API