Smith v. Pachter
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Justice Drew:
I am constrained to dissent from the opinion of the majority in these appeals, for .1 have searched the record in its entirety in vain for the slightest evidence of. negligence on. the part of defendant. A. careful scrutiny of the testimony adduced reveals that the sole cause of this unfortunate accident, was the negligence of these two young ladies, .who at.the time they sustained their injuries were of the ages, of sixteen years and-three months, and fourteen years and eleven months, respectively. Both of them -had sufficient • capacity and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Leslie v. CatanzaroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Rhoads v. HerbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Post v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Justice v. WeymannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Idell v. DaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.