Niederstadt v. Ancho Rico Consolidated Mines
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HERNANDEZ, Judge.
Plaintiff seeks review of a judgment under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, § 59-10-1 through § 59-10-37, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 9, pt. 1), awarding him $1,172.57 for temporary total disability and payments for a 20% partial permanent disability for the remainder of the statutory period. Five points are urged as grounds for reversal. Defendants cross-appeal, alleging one point of error.
We reverse.(1) Plaintiff’s first point-is that the trial court erred in ruling that he was not enti-tied to take the deposition of Dr. Mario Palafox at the expense of defendants.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- G.E.J. Corporation and M.F. Corporation v. Uranium Aire, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Landers v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Winford Leo Evans v. Stearns-Roger Manufacturing Co., Employer and Standard Accident Insurance Co., InsurerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Larry Klepal, as Administrator of the Goods, Chattels and Credits of Larry Klepal, Deceased v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Escobedo v. Agriculture Products Co., Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Fryar v. JohnsenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Sanchez v. Molycorp, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- Banks v. IMC Kalium Carlsbad Potash Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- Grudzina v. New Mexico Youth Diagnostic & Development CenterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Alleman v. ShoatsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.