Legal Opinion

Escobedo v. Agriculture Products Co., Inc.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1974No. 1344PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff’s appeal in this workmen’s compensation case raises issues concerning: (1) refusal of medical services; (2) a gap in compensation benefits; (3) cost of a deposition; (4) reexamination of plaintiff and doctor-patient privilege; and, (5) attorney fees.

Refusal of medical services.

The trial court found that plaintiff “has suffered and is suffering a total temporary disability” as a result of a compensable injury on December 31, 1970. The trial court also found that plaintiff “has refused and refuses to submit to a myelogram or to any medical or surgical…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. James F. Toal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  2. H. T. Coker Construction Co. v. Whitfield Transportation, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Adams v. Loffland Brothers Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Williams v. City of GallupNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Aguayo v. Village of ChamaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Niederstadt v. Ancho Rico Consolidated MinesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Trujillo v. Beaty Elec. Co., Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. United Technology & Resources, Inc. v. Dar Al IslamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Archuleta v. Safeway Stores, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Romo v. Raton Coca Cola Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API