Legal Opinion
Grudzina v. New Mexico Youth Diagnostic & Development Center
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided May 8, 1986No. 8306PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Judge.
Defendants appeal the trial court’s decision to award plaintiff one day’s compensation and attorney fees. Defendants contend that one day’s temporary disability is not compensable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, NMSA 1978, Sections 52-1-1 through 52-1-69, and that the trial court awarded excessive attorney fees. Plaintiff cross-appeals, claiming the trial court erred in failing to find that he was temporarily totally disabled from the time he resigned to the time of trial and in failing to award past and future medical and rehabilitation benefits. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
- Martinez v. Research Park, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- Garcia v. Genuine Parts Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- Sanchez v. Homestake Mining Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. HeislerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of SeylerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- Nunez v. Smith's Management Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. GallegosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- Sanchez v. Zanio's Foods, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- ALBUQUERQUE COMMONS v. City CouncilNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.