Legal Opinion

Automated Tracking Systems, Inc. v. Great American Insurance

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1998No. 18906PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Baird, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant Automated Tracking System, Inc. (“ATS”) appeals the decision of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas vacating the portion of an arbitration award which gave ATS $1,050,000 for attorney fees as part of ATS’s expenses in the arbitration. We reverse.

On September 30, 1994, ATS and defendant-appellee Great American Insurance Company, Inc. (“GAI”) entered into a service agreement. The contract provided that ATS would provide GAI with collateral insurance tracking services in exchange for a monthly fee. 1

An arbitration clause at Paragraph 8.1 of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Nottingdale Homeowners' Ass'n v. DarbyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Mahoning County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities v. Mahoning County TMR Education Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,943 Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. And Sam Alberico v. Stanley F. JarosCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Sunnywood Land Dev., 06ca0089-M (5-7-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Stow Firefighters, IAFF Local 1662 v. City of StowOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Hughes v. HughesOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. McCulloch v. Janney Montgomery Scott L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. New Par v. Misuraca, 06ca009060 (6-29-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API