Legal Opinion
New Par v. Misuraca, 06ca009060 (6-29-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 29, 2007No. 06CA009060PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
This cause was heard upon the record in the trial court. Each error assigned has been reviewed and the following disposition is made:
{¶ 1} Appellant, Richard Misuraca, appeals the confirmation of an arbitration award in favor of Appellee New Par a.k.a. Verizon Wireless by the Lorain County Court of Common Pleas. We affirm.
{¶ 2} On July 27, 2005, an arbitration hearing was held before the American Arbitration Association1 regarding a dispute between Appellant and Appellee about unpaid invoices related to Appellant's use of Appellee's service to send facsimile…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,943 Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. And Sam Alberico v. Stanley F. JarosCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Local Union No. 200, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Board of Education v. Findlay Education Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Ohio Office of Collective Bargaining v. Ohio Civil Service Employees Ass'n, Local 11Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- City of Hillsboro v. Fraternal Order of PoliceOhio Supreme Court · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ward v. Ohio State WaterproofingOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Ward v. Ohio State WaterproofingOhio Court of Appeals · 2013