Legal Opinion
Hughes v. Hughes
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 29, 2020No. 19AP-329PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Hughes v. Hughes,
2020-Ohio-4653.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Carl F. Hughes, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 19AP-329 v. : (C.P.C. No. 18CV-10344) Martin J. Hughes, III et al., : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Defendants-Appellees. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on September 29, 2020 On brief: Zeiger, Tigges & Little LLP, Marion H. Little, Jr., and Christopher J. Hogan, for appellant. Argued: Christopher J. Hogan. On brief: Taft Stettinius & Hollister, LLP, Julia B. Meister, Russell S. Sayre, and Philip D. Williamson, for appellee Martin J. Hughes, III. Argued: Julia B.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,943 Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. And Sam Alberico v. Stanley F. JarosCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Local Union No. 200, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Woodrow W. Dawahare v. Adam A. Spencer Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. Smith Barney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cafaro-Peachcreek Joint Venture Partnership v. SpanggardOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. CrumptonOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- Hughes v. HughesOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Cleveland Botanical Garden v. Worthington DrewienOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- Cleveland Botanical Garden v. Worthington DrewienOhio Supreme Court · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.