Kolb v. Hayes
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*Rosenjbkrry, J.
That the subcontractor Braman was within the case of Weyauwega v. Industrial Comm. 180 Wis. 168, 192 N. W. 452, an independent contractor, is not open to substantial dispute. While it is not conceded, the principal argument of the plaintiffs is based upon the proposition that the defendant is liable regardless of whether or not the blasting was done by an independent contractor. We shall not restate the principles of law so carefully and thoroughly reviewed in the Weyauwega Case. For the benefit of those interested in the historical development of the doctrine, reference is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Norwalk Gaslight Co. v. Borough of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Smith v. Milwaukee Builders' & Traders' ExchangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Village of Weyauwega v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Carlson v. StockingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Southern Surety Co. v. Metropolitan Sewerage CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Criswell v. Seaman Body Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Medley v. Trenton Investment Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Kniess v. American Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Menge v. MantheyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930