Medley v. Trenton Investment Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
The defendant earnestly contends that the court erred in denying its motions for a directed verdict, for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, to change the answers. of the jury, and for a new trial. The denial of defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict may be considered together. Defendant’s contentions are based upon the following propositions : (1) The defendant is not liable for the negligence of Bennett because McCabe had no authority to contract with him to do the work of exterminating bedbugs in the Smith apartment. (2) Bennett, in any…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Norwalk Gaslight Co. v. Borough of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Smith v. Milwaukee Builders' & Traders' ExchangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Village of Weyauwega v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Wertheimer v. SaundersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Paltey v. . EganNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hayes v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Brooks v. HayesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- S.A. Gerrard Co., Inc. v. FrickerArizona Supreme Court · 1933
- Ferguson v. AshkenazyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- McKennon v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.