Legal Opinion

Douglass v. Serenivision, Inc.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided February 8, 2018No. B277574PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoffstadt, J.

*380There is a "strong presumption that courts should determine the jurisdiction of arbitrators." ( Sandquist v. Lebo Automotive, Inc. (2016) 1 Cal.5th 233, 249, 205 Cal.Rptr.3d 359, 376 P.3d 506 ( Sandquist ).) Parties may nevertheless agree to let an arbitrator decide his or her own jurisdiction, at least if their agreement to do so is " 'clear [ ] and unmistakabl[e].' " ( Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (2002) 537 U.S. 79, 83, 123 S.Ct. 588, 154 L.Ed.2d 491 ( Howsam ).) Does a party clearly and unmistakably consent to have an arbitrator decide his own jurisdiction when that party does not…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. BG Group, PLC v. Republic of ArgentinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Benaroya v. Willis, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Benaroya v. WillisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  3. Bravo v. Charter Communications CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Darby v. Sisyphian, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  5. Gen Digital, Inc. v. Sycomp, a Technology Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API