Douglass v. Serenivision, Inc.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtHoffstadt, J.
*380There is a "strong presumption that courts should determine the jurisdiction of arbitrators." ( Sandquist v. Lebo Automotive, Inc. (2016) 1 Cal.5th 233, 249, 205 Cal.Rptr.3d 359, 376 P.3d 506 ( Sandquist ).) Parties may nevertheless agree to let an arbitrator decide his or her own jurisdiction, at least if their agreement to do so is " 'clear [ ] and unmistakabl[e].' " ( Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (2002) 537 U.S. 79, 83, 123 S.Ct. 588, 154 L.Ed.2d 491 ( Howsam ).) Does a party clearly and unmistakably consent to have an arbitrator decide his own jurisdiction when that party does not…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- BG Group, PLC v. Republic of ArgentinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Benaroya v. Willis, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Benaroya v. WillisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Bravo v. Charter Communications CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Darby v. Sisyphian, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Gen Digital, Inc. v. Sycomp, a Technology Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.