Bearden v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
THEIS, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company’s motion for partial summary judgment on Billy Bearden’s punitive damages claim. In its Opinion and Order of April 15, 1986, this Court observed parenthetically that “John Hancock’s mistaken assumption that the statutes here in question did not apply to them is probably not sufficient to submit a question of punitive damages to a jury.” 635 F.Supp. 1084, 1088. That is precisely the question presented at this juncture for a ruling.
The Court has previously delineated the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Little Redhouse, Brady Tah, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. Quality Ford Sales, Inc., a Utah Corporation, and Thomas E. ReddCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Iola State Bank v. BolanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Johnson v. Geer Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1986
- Flaspohler v. HoffmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nal II, Ltd. v. TonkinDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1989
- Little v. Reed-Prentice Division of Package Machinery Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Harnett v. ParrisDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Citizens Bank & Trust v. Brothers Construction & Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1993