Legal Opinion

Harnett v. Parris

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided April 24, 1996No. 94-4251-SACPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CROW, District Judge.

The case comes before the court on the defendant National Greyhound Association’s motion for partial summary judgment (Dk. 48). The plaintiff brings this diversity action advancing claims of negligence, breach of contract, and outrage against the defendant National Greyhound Association (“NGA”). The plaintiff has dismissed his claim against the individual defendants. (Dk. 21, 23). The defendant NGA seeks summary judgment as to the plaintiffs outrage and punitive damage claims.

SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARDS

A court grants a motion for summary judgment under…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Bacchus Industries, Inc. v. Arvin Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. David L. White v. York International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McShares, Inc. v. BarryDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
  2. Baer v. Terminix Intern. Co., Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API