Legal Opinion

People v. Roland

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 26, 1933No. Docket No. 2385PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

Under separate counts of an information filed against him, defendant was convicted of the crimes respectively of grand theft and petty theft. From the ensuing judgments, and from an order by which his motion for a new trial was denied, defendant has appealed to this court.

The essential facts connected with the offenses of which defendant was convicted are substantially as follows: Acting as a real estate agent, defendant effected an exchange of certain property which was owned by a Mr. and Mrs. Spencer. In such exchange, the property received by the latter was a bungalow court which was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. RabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. People v. WhippleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. People v. CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. People v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. State v. EnoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. HallnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. People v. MegladderyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Sheffield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  4. People v. ZelverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API