Legal Opinion

People v. Carter

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 12, 1933No. Docket No. 2333PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

The defendants appeal from a judgment of conviction of the crime of grand theft and from an order by which their motion for a new trial was denied.

Briefly, the evidence adduced on the trial of the action purports to establish the facts which support the conclusion that by reason of certain false representations or pretenses made by the defendants to the owners of an automobile, the defendants secured possession and ostensible ownership of said automobile and thereby defrauded the owners thereof of its value.

Appellants predicate prejudicial error on the refusal of the trial court to give to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. MathewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Mack v. JastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. People v. PlumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. People v. LeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Jewett v. City Transfer & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. BreyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. People v. ChaitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. People v. CurranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. People v. Di GiacomoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API