Legal Opinion
Lyons v. Coxcom, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 8, 2009No. 3:08-cr-02047PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE, GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND, & VACATING ORDER
MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge.
On November 4, 2008, Plaintiff Lynn Lyons (“Lyons”) filed a class action complaint against Defendant Coxcom, Inc., doing business as Cox Communications, Inc. (“Cox”). (Doc. No. 1, Compl.) On February 6, 2009, 2009 WL 347285, the Court granted Defendant Cox’s motion to dismiss and granted Plaintiff leave to amend. (Doc. No. 34.) Plaintiff filed a first amended class action complaint (“FAC”) on March 9, 2009 against Cox Communications, Inc. and Cox Enterprises,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ott v. Mortgage Investors Corp. of Ohio, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Baesel v. Mutual Of Omaha Mortgage, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Carranza-Ambris v. The Terminix International Company Limited PartnershipDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Cedarview Mart, LLC v. State Auto Property and Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2021
- Fares v. Char-Broil, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.