Legal Opinion
Carranza-Ambris v. The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 29, 2021No. 3:20-cv-01819Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAIME CARRANZA, individually and on Case No.: 20-cv-1819-DMS-WVG behalf of all others similarly situated, 12 ORDER (1) DENYING Plaintiff, 13 DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO v. STRIKE, (2) DENYING 14 DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO THE TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL 15 DISMISS COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 This case comes before the Court on Defendant The Terminix International 20 Company Limited Partnership’s (“Terminix”) motion to strike Plaintiff Jaime Carranza’s 21 class allegations, or in the alternative, to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Ellis v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.