Legal Opinion

United States v. Lundy

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided June 19, 2003No. ARMY 20000069PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

STOCKEL, Judge:

A military judge, sitting as a general court-martial, convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of forcible sodomy of a child under twelve years of age, forcible sodomy of a child under sixteen years of age, and inde*803cent acts with a child under sixteen years of age (six specifications), in violation of Articles 125 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 925 and 934 [hereinafter UCMJ]. Further, appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of attempted carnal knowledge with a child over the age of twelve years and attempted indecent acts…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. United States v. MezzanattoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. LundyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  2. United States v. LundyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  3. United States v. LundyArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  4. United States v. LundyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  5. United States v. LundyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API