United States v. Lundy
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STOCKEL, Judge:
A military judge, sitting as a general court-martial, convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of forcible sodomy of a child under twelve years of age, forcible sodomy of a child under sixteen years of age, and inde*803cent acts with a child under sixteen years of age (six specifications), in violation of Articles 125 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 925 and 934 [hereinafter UCMJ]. Further, appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of attempted carnal knowledge with a child over the age of twelve years and attempted indecent acts…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. MezzanattoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. LundyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. LundyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
- United States v. LundyArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
- United States v. LundyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. LundyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004