Legal Opinion

United States v. Lundy

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided March 10, 2005No. ARMY 20000069PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON REMAND

STOCKEL, Judge:*

A military judge, sitting as a general court-martial, convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of forcible sodomy of a child under twelve years of age, forcible sodomy of a child under sixteen years of age, and indecent acts with a child under sixteen years of age (six specifications), in violation of Articles 125 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 925 and 934 [hereinafter UCMJ]. Appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of attempted carnal knowledge with a child over the age of twelve years and attempted indecent…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Thayer-West Point Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States v. PerronCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  4. United States v. RussoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  5. United States v. ProwUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. LundyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  2. United States v. LundyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API