United States v. Lundy
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT ON REMAND
STOCKEL, Judge:*
A military judge, sitting as a general court-martial, convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of forcible sodomy of a child under twelve years of age, forcible sodomy of a child under sixteen years of age, and indecent acts with a child under sixteen years of age (six specifications), in violation of Articles 125 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 925 and 934 [hereinafter UCMJ]. Appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of attempted carnal knowledge with a child over the age of twelve years and attempted indecent…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Thayer-West Point Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. PerronCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- United States v. RussoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
- United States v. ProwUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. LundyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. LundyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006