Legal Opinion

Henry v. AL ZACHRY COMPANY

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 20, 1956No. 36012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, J. 1.

The plaintiff’s general demurrer to the defendant’s answer was based on the ground that the answer did not set forth any defense to the check sued on. “Absence or failure of consideration is matter of defense as against any person not a holder in due course, and partial failure of consideration is a defense pro tanto, whether the failure is an ascertained and liquidated amount or otherwise.” Code § 14-305. Accordingly, the defendant’s plea of failure of consideration, to withstand demurrer would have to allege facts showing affirmatively that the plaintiff was not a “holder in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carnation v. PridgenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  2. Evans v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Floyd Construction Co. v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  2. Star Provision Co. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  3. Floyd Construction Co. v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API