Legal Opinion

Star Provision Co. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 27, 1956No. 36121PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

Construing the pleadings i'n the answer of the defendant most strongly against the pleader, as must be done on demurrer, the answer, although alleging that the swine were stolen, is an attempt to set up “fraud in the procurement” as a defense to the plaintiff’s petition. “Fraud in the procurement of a negotiable instrument as a defense, refers to fraud on the part of the holder and not fraud on the part of the person obtaining such negotiable instrument from the maker. Evans v. Johnson, 77 Ga. App. 277, 279 (48 S. E. 2d 159), and cases cited.” Henry v. A. L. Zachry Co., 93 Ga. App. 536, 538…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Evans v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  2. Henry v. AL ZACHRY COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Floyd Construction Co. v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  2. Floyd Construction Co. v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API