Legal Opinion

Carnation v. Pridgen

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 23, 1951No. 33774PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The special grounds of the amended motion for a new trial are merely amplifications of the general grounds, and will be treated with them. One of the contentions of the plaintiff is that the record contains no evidence from which the jury would be justified in finding that the plaintiff was not a holder in due course and for value of the instrument sued upon, for which reason it was error to allow the defendant to testify, at one point, that he never received the grapevines. As stated in Silver v. Sellers, 59 Ga. App. 690, 692, (2 S. E. 2d, 216), once the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Groover v. BrandonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  2. Jones v. RoperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  3. Silver v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. American President Lines, Ltd. v. Federal Maritime Board (Now Federal Maritime Commission) and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  2. Reese v. Ideal Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. Henry v. AL ZACHRY COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  4. Securities Investment Co. v. CohenMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Bank of Sardis v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API