Legal Opinion

Floyd Construction Co. v. Stanley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 19, 1960No. 38213Published

1Opinion of the Court

101 Ga. App. 696 (1960)

115 S.E.2d 231

FLOYD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al.

v.

STANLEY.

38213.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided May 19, 1960.

Crawford, Leeb & Calhoun, Ralph L. Crawford, John R. Calhoun, for plaintiffs in error.

Anton F. Solms, Jr., contra.

NICHOLS, Judge.

1. This is a suit brought by the payee of a promissory note, as plaintiff, against the makers of the note, as defendants. The plaintiff being the payee in the negotiable instrument which is the subject matter of this suit is not, under the Negotiable Instruments Act, a holder in due course. Davis v. Nat. City Bank of Rome, 46 Ga.…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Bell; Concurrence · Felton.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. American Car Co. v. Atlanta Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Atlanta Consolidated Bottling Co. v. Hutchinson & SonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Kingery v. Yancey Brothers CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  4. Hilton v. Sylvania & Girard RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  5. Davis v. National City BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API