Legal Opinion

Gibson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 7, 1992No. 89-113PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Associate Judge:

Appellant challenges, on constitutional grounds, the statutory provision declaring those previously convicted of specified drug trafficking offenses to be ineligible to invoke the addict exception 1 to the mandatory-minimum sentencing requirements of the Controlled Substance Act. 2 Although we have rejected constitutional challenges to other provisions of the mandatory-minimum sentencing statute in previous cases, 3 we have not been called upon to consider constitutional challenges to the prior conviction exclusion.

In four separate indictments appellant was charged with…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Holiday v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. In Re DulanseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Dean v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Bratcher v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Pansing v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API