Gibson v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Associate Judge:
Appellant challenges, on constitutional grounds, the statutory provision declaring those previously convicted of specified drug trafficking offenses to be ineligible to invoke the addict exception 1 to the mandatory-minimum sentencing requirements of the Controlled Substance Act. 2 Although we have rejected constitutional challenges to other provisions of the mandatory-minimum sentencing statute in previous cases, 3 we have not been called upon to consider constitutional challenges to the prior conviction exclusion.
In four separate indictments appellant was charged with…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Holiday v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re DulanseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Dean v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Bratcher v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Pansing v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.