Legal Opinion

Pansing v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1995No. 93-CF-1502PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAGNER, Chief Judge:

Appellant, David W. Pansing, appeals from the imposition of a mandatory minimum sentence of twenty (20) months to five (5) years pursuant to D.C.Code § 33-541(c)(l)(A-3)(ii) (1993) following his conviction of possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance (PWID) (methylenedioxymethamphe-tamine) (MDMA) (known as “ecstacy”) in violation of D.C.Code § 33 — 541(a)(1).1 Following a pre-sentencing evidentiary hearing, the trial court found that Pansing did not qualify for sentencing under the addict exception because he failed to prove that he was an addict and that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rock Creek Plaza-Woodner Ltd. Partnership v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Blakeney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Prost v. GreeneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Wilkes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Grant v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re StanbackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. In Re StanbackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API