Legal Opinion
In Re Dulansey
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 10, 1992No. 91-862PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent, David G. Dulansey, challenges on appeal the Board on Professional Responsibility’s recommendation that he be disbarred for his intentional misappropriation of client funds, which resulted in violations of DR 9-103(A) (commingling), DR 9-103(A) (misappropriation) and DR 1-102(A)(4) (dishonesty). The Board found that Respondent, while moonlighting as a private practitioner in violation of a policy imposed by his employer’s general counsel, settled for $25,000 a personal injury claim that he had taken on a one-fourth contingent fee basis. Respondent deposited the settlement check…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re PiersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re BerrymanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re HewettDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- In Re ClarkeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.