Legal Opinion

Union Traction Co. v. Moneyhun

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1922No. 24,065PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTravis, J.

Appellee sued for damages for personal injuries and injuries to property inflicted by the appellant. A statement of facts deemed sufficient for an understanding of the application of the legal doctrines invoked is as follows: '

Appellant operated a single track interurban railway along and upon one of the principal public streets of a city. Appellee was driving south along a street that crossed the street upon which the railway was located, at right angles. The street occupied by the railway had been paved on either side of the track in the fall, just prior to the approach of winter, and the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Union Traction Co. v. BerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. SchmidtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. McGee v. Consolidated Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Consolidated Traction Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In Re Armory Site in Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. Arata v. Monsanto Chemical CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  3. Strandberg v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. Annbar Associates v. West Side Redevelopment Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  5. Wolfe v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API