Tienda v. Integon National Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSaad, J.
Defendant Integon National Insurance Company appeals the trial court’s order denying its motion for summary disposition and granting summary disposition in favor of intervening defendant Titan Insurance Company. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand.
I. NATURE OF THE CASE
The answer to the question of which insurer, Integon or Titan, is responsible for personal protection insurance (PIP) benefits arising out of a Michigan automobile accident depends on where the insured, Salvador Lorenzo, resided at the time of the accident. Because of its peculiar facts, this case raises a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Koontz v. Ameritech Services, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Klein v. HP Pelzer Automotive Systems, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- DIALLO v. LaROCHELLEMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- Kaitlin Hahn v. Geico Indemnity CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Kaitlin Hahn v. Geico Indemnity CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Lonnie Bridges v. Geico Casualty CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.