Legal Opinion

Kaitlin Hahn v. Geico Indemnity Company

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 2018No. 336583Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS KAITLIN HAHN, UNPUBLISHED June 12, 2018 Plaintiff-Appellee, v No. 336583 Oakland Circuit Court GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, LC No. 2016-152229-NF Defendant-Appellant, and AUTOMOBILE CLUB INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, Defendant. Before: SAWYER, P.J., and CAVANAGH and FORT HOOD, JJ. PER CURIAM. Defendant, Geico Indemnity Company (Geico), appeals by leave granted1 the trial court’s opinion and order, which denied Geico’s motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings. Plaintiff, Kaitlin…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Rovas v. SBC MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  4. In Re Complaint of Rovas Against SbcMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Trentadue v. Buckler Automatic Lawn Sprinkler CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API