Legal Opinion
Prentice v. Board of Administration
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 7, 2007No. D049252PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, J.
The Legislature and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS) have adopted limitations on the salary which may be considered in calculating a public employee’s retirement allowance. Among other matters, these limitations exclude from consideration payments which were not available to similarly situated public employees. In this case a local municipality decided to provide the manager of its water and power department with a 10.49 percent salary increase during what turned out to be the last two years of his career. Although the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- City of Sacramento v. Public Employees Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Kuykendall v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Jaramillo v. State Board for Geologists & GeophysicistsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Santa Monica Police Officers Ass'n v. Bd. of Admin. of Pub. Emps.' Ret. Sys.California Court of Appeal · 1977
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Pleasanton v. Board of Administration of Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Molina v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Richard B.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services v. Sandra D.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Tanner v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.