Santa Monica Police Officers Ass'n v. Bd. of Admin. of Pub. Emps.' Ret. Sys.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, P. J.
Plaintiff and appellant represents retired police officers Formerly employed by real party in interest, City of Santa Monica (City). When they retired, these employees received lump-sum payments For unused sick leave and vacation time. Respondent Public Employees Retirement System (Board) did not—and does not—include such lump-sum payments in computing the retirement pensions to which these employees are entitled. After an administrative hearing, the Board refused to include such payments, and this writ petition followed. The trial court ruled in favor of the Board and the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Anderson v. Pension & Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
3Cited by9 opinions
- Amos v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Retirement CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Kreeft v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Rose v. City of HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- City of Sacramento v. Public Employees Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.