Legal Opinion

Modjeski & Masters v. Pack

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1965PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is an appeal by the complainant below from a decree of the Chancery Court dismissing the original bill, which prayed for writs of injunction and mandamus, on defendant’s motion, which was in the nature of a demurrer.

The bill alleges that on February 14, 1957, appellant entered into a written contract with the Department of Highways and Public Works of the State of Tennessee (now the Department of Highways of the State of Tennessee) by which appellant agreed to furnish and perform various professional services as consulting engineers in assembling all data and making all necessary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peerless Construction Co. v. BassTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Insurance Co. v. CraigTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Fritts v. LeechTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Case v. BloodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Maryland Classified Employees Ass'n v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Libby v. City of DillinghamAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Libby v. City of DillinghamAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Brookeville Turnpike Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Brookeville Turnpike Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API