Libby v. City of Dillingham
Alaska Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceRabino Witz, Justice
I agree with the majority’s conclusion that the lease of the Dillingham cold storage facility was subject to the requirements of AS 29.48.260(c), including its competitive bidding requirement. However, I would reach that result by a statutory interpretation different from that employed by the majority.
AS 29.48.260(e) provides:
A municipality, in order to make sites available for beneficial new industries, may acquire and hold real property, either inside or outside the corporate limits, and may sell, lease or dispose of it to persons who agree to operate a beneficial new industry upon the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Isakson v. RickeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Green v. City of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- Clem v. City of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Coller v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Whelan v. New Jersey Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.