Legal Opinion

Insurance Co. v. Craig

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1901PublishedCited by 54 opinions

BROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Davidson County. II. H. Cook, Oh.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

This cause stands on bill and demurrer. The complainant, The North British and Mercantile Company, of Edinburg and London, alleges that it is a corporation chartered and organized under the laws of Great Britain, with authority and power to conduct the business of fire insurance in that dominion and in the vari-*625ons States and territories of the United States of America; that it now is, and for years has been, conducting that business in those States and territories under the authority of their respective laws; that it has annually, for several successive years, including the present year…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Orient Insurance v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Decatur v. PauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  4. Pennoyer v. McConnaughySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Board of Liquidation v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Colonial Pipeline Co. v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Neff v. Cherokee Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Automobile Sales Co. v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Hill v. BeelerTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Kelly v. ConnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1909

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API