Legal Opinion
Maryland Classified Employees Ass'n v. Anderson
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 7, 1977No. [No. 20, September Term, 1977.]PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.
We decide on this appeal that compensation of employees of a chartered county may not be committed to binding arbitration unless so authorized by a public general law of Maryland or the organic law of that county. We hold specifically that those provisions of the Harford County Code (1965) (the County Code) requiring that such matters with respect to Harford County be submitted to binding arbitration are invalid as not authorized by a public general law or the Harford County Charter (1973) (the County Charter).
I
We are called upon to determine the propriety of an order of the Circuit Court for…
2Cases cited97 opinions
- Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Cohoes City School District v. Cohoes Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Fire Fighters Union, Local 1186 v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Norwalk Teachers' Ass'n v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Bd. of Ed. for Dorchester Co. v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Lockyer v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement System v. Mayor of Baltimore CityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Office & Professional Employees International Union, Local 2 v. Mass Transit AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Board of Education v. Prince George's County Educators' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.