Legal Opinion

Ne Casek v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1965No. Civ. 27592PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaus, J.

Appeal from judgment of dismissal, following the sustaining of defendants’ demurrers without leave to amend.

The first amended complaint to which the demurrers were directed alleged in substance:

The individual defendants Conrad and Modarelli were police officers employed by the defendant City of Los Angeles on November 22, 1961. In the afternoon of that day they had arrested and handcuffed two persons whom they had charged or suspected of an undisclosed violation of law and who “defendants knew, or in the exercise of reasonable care should have known, were dangerous, desperate and desirous of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gregoire v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  2. People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Richards v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Lipman v. Brisbane Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Ladd v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. McCorkle v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Tice v. CramerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  5. Ammlung v. PlattSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API