Legal Opinion

Sandel v. Whisenhunt

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 12, 1932No. 13537PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice BeEase.

This is another of those confusing cases in claim and delivery of personal property, involving the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage of crops and mules. It is much more difficult in our practice to- foreclose a mortgage of this character than to foreclose one of real estate. Some day in the near future, as the writer hopes and believes, the procedure as to the foreclosure of chattel mortgages will be much simplified.

The plaintiff instituted this action in the County Court of Orangeburg County seeking to recover the possession…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilkins v. WillimonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  2. State v. BowmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. Builders' Lumber & Supply Co. v. CheekSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  4. Manley v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  5. Duc v. SeelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cannon v. Haverty Furniture Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  2. South Carolina National Bank v. Florence Sporting Goods, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  3. Whisenhunt v. SandelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API